Friday, January 29, 2010

Essay on Romans 6

DEAD TO SIN
Romans 6:1-2 "What shall we say then?  Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?  God forbid.  How shall we that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?"

There is more to salvation than being delivered from the penalty of sin and receiving eternal life.  When we by faith accept Jesus Christ as our Savior, our union with Jesus Christ delivers us from the power of sin.  We are "dead to sin" (v1), "baptized into his death" (v3), "crucified with him" (v6), "dead indeed unto sin" (v11), "made free from sin" (v18, 22).

Romans 6:6-7 "Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed from sin."

The "old man" is a body of sin with a corrupt, sinful nature that yearns to sin.  The "old man" is a servant to sin; the "old man" yields his members to obey and serve sin.  The "old man" cannot serve Jesus Christ as his new  master because he is required to serve one master, sin, until death.

When we by faith accept Jesus Christ as our Savior, our "old man" is "crucified with Christ", "baptized into his death", "made free from sin".  Dead men don't serve masters; dead men don't sin.  The death of the "old man" released me from my bondage to sin.  I am no longer required to serve sin; I am dead to sin.

ALIVE UNTO GOD
Romans 6:11 "Likewise, reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord."

Just as the "old man" is dead indeed unto sin; the "new man" is alive unto God.

Romans 6:4-5 "...that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.  For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection."


Romans 6:18 "Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness."
The "new man" is not required to serve the old master, sin.  He is free to serve a new master, righteousness.

Romans 6:4-5 "...that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection."
The "new man" has a new life, and a new way of life.  His way of life will not resemble that of the "old man", but rather that of Christ.
The "new man" is free to "yield his members servants to righteousness unto holiness" (v 19).

I am no longer dead in trespasses in sins; I am alive unto God.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

One is One

John 17:21-22
"That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us: that the world may believe that thou hast sent me.   And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them; that they may be one, even as we are one"


Jesus is asking God to give His believers oneness with each other, God, and Himself.  He declares that He is one with God the Father.


In John 14:6, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. "

Why is Jesus the only way to come to God the Father?  Because they are one.  You can't reject one and receive the other.  If you reject one, you reject both.  If you reject Jesus Christ the Son, you reject God the Father.  Then the most serious question any human being will ever answer is this: what will you do with Jesus Christ?  Will you reject him?  If so, you have rejected God the Father.  Will you receive him?  If so, you have received God the Father, and God the Father will receive you as His child.

This idea of oneness crops up in marriage, for that is the human relationship we experience that comes closest to oneness.  The Bible teaches that God views married couple as one.  The oneness of marriage is also felt by those who are married, as well as those who know them.  For example, before marriage, Bill is referred to as "Bill".  After marriage, Bill is referred to as "Bill and Jane".

This oneness is the very reason that it doesn't go over very well to reject the husband and receive the wife, or vice versa.  If you reject one, you will find that both feel rejected.  You will not long keep a friend whose spouse you reject.  You may as well slap your friend in the face as insult his wife.  On the other hand, you will rarely find yourself at odds with a friend whose spouse you receive.  When you befriend your friend's spouse, you draw him yet closer.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

My father wasn't in the mafia and other rumors....

Some of the family myths that float around at family gatherings remind me of those articles in The National Enquirer - long on sensation, short on facts.

Sometimes a myth springs up rather innocently out of simple misunderstanding of the facts, like the one about my father being in the mafia.  He wasn't.  But somehow my son misunderstood the true account he overheard as a child, and carried this wrong belief around for years.  I wish I'd known sooner - I would've cleared the whole thing up with the facts.

Sometimes a myth springs up as an exaggeration of the facts, like the one about the family's giant poodle who was so smart he answered the phone or something like that.

Sometimes a myth springs up from repetition of a theme, like the one about the daughter-in-law who's just a bad wife and a bad mother.  Pretty typical scenario here, nothing unusual.  Mother-in-law casually weaves a couple of negative remarks into the conversation.  You know the stuff.   "I couldn't believe she fed that baby SHRIMP!".  Or "She went off to a conference while the kids had chicken-pox."  Sprinkle some facts into a story, spin it a little, and voila - we have a family myth, and a rather unflattering one...

Puts me in mind of the story of the prodigal son.  After the prodigal son returns, the father orders a banquet to celebrate his return.  When the good son asked 'hey, what's the party for', a servant told him the facts - your brother came home, so your father threw him a party -- but not the truth.  The truth was -- your brother came home humbled, broken, and asking for forgiveness, then your father forgave him, and now they're celebrating their reunion.  Sometimes there's a world of difference between the facts and the truth.

So here's the truth about just a few of our family myths that have been circulating lately.

(1) Was my father in the mafia?
No, he wasn't in the mafia, but he may have inadvertantly been employed by a mafia man.  Here's the truth.  My father accepted a job to manage a new business.  The owner was not upset that the business lost money month after month after month.  Didn't seem to concern him in the least.  Hmmm.  My father began to suspect that the business was a money-laundering operation, and he resigned (as tactfully and carefully as possible).

(2) Did I feed my baby shrimp?
No, I didn't feed my baby shrimp.  But one time I wound up at Long John Silver's with some of the family.  There weren't many items on the menu that my toddler could eat.  I fed him cole slaw.  Maybe not the best choice, but honestly, I was trying to be a good sport about the restaurant choice. 

(3) Did I abandon my sick children with their helpless father?
No.  Here's the truth.  There was an overnight choir retreat, and I was choir pianist.  We had planned to go as a family, but Zachary was just getting over chicken pox, and we knew Tyler and Lauren might break out any day.  So they didn't need to go.  Alton offered to stay home with them while Zach and I went on the retreat.  It was a short retreat - just Friday evening and back by Saturday evening.  Saturday morning, Alton called to say Tyler and Lauren had broken out.  We had two rehearsals on Saturday and drove home.  Here's the truth.  Alton and I worked out a plan together as a team.  He's not the kind of dad who grumbles about taking care of  the kids.  That's one of the ways he expresses love - by taking care of them.  He appreciates that I lend a hand with earning a living.  And I appreciate that he lends a hand with taking care of our children.  The day-to-day tasks in our house are not strictly assigned as "his job" or "her job".  We pitch in and help out with whatever task needs doing.  We cooperate.  Lean on each other.

Here's another truth.  I didn't do everything right as a parent.  I'm pretty sure I introduced Gerber's Dutch Apple Dessert too early into my children's diet.  I'm absolutely positive I yelled at my children just like my parents yelled at me, right up until the day that a true friend gently corrected me.  It took awhile to break the habit of yelling at my kids, but I did it through the guidance and conviction of the Holy Spirit, because....

...here's another truth... I wanted to become a good parent.  I wanted something better for my children than I experienced as a child.  I read Dr Spock from cover to cover and tried to practice it.  YIKES.  Sorry.  Honestly, I just didn't know any better.  I didn't know how to be a good parent, but I wanted to learn.

Which leads to a deeper question.  Why was crummy Dr Spock the only parenting book I was ever given?  Answer: there wasn't a mentor-figure in my life in those years.  I had a mom and a mother-in-law who might have provided coaching and mentoring.  But at the time, one wasn't ready for the grandmother thing and the other's input came across as heckling more than mentoring.
One final thought.  I really am sorry I started off badly.  And it hurts my heart to think I shorted my children.  But is it appropriate to park there and mope and mourn?  Or is it appropriate to "forget those things which are behind and press toward the mark"?  Honestly, that's what I've been trying to do, but it's hard when The Accuser dredges up the past over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.... well you get it.

Twenty-five years ago I was following the drumbeat of the world.  But God began to draw me back to Him through my children.  My desire to be a good Mom drove me back to church, back to the Bible, back to a relationship with Jesus Christ.  If you compared a typical day of my life 25 years ago with a typical day of my life now, you would see a big difference.  The Lord has accomplished much change in my life so far, and has much more to do.
The truth of the matter is that both Alton and I got off to a poor start as parents.  The Lord used trials to draw us back to Him, and we began to change little by little.  We both honestly regret our poor start, and all the mistakes we made along the way.  But are those mistakes unforgivable?  Unpardonable?  Is there any evidence that we "pressed on toward the mark?"

Just the other day, a man said, "You have two fine sons.  You must be proud of them."  I simply said, "Yes, I am."  I could've qualified my remark with, "Well, they haven't been perfect sons."  Which is true.  They haven't been perfect.  But why dredge up the muck of the trouble we had with them in the past?  They are becoming truly fine men.  Period.  I don't think of them in terms of the trouble they caused me through the years; I don't harbor ill will toward them.  I think of them in terms of the people they are today.  My memories and wounds from the former times are bound up and healed by forgiveness and grace.

I wonder, will there come a time when I get to live among people who are done dredging up the muck of the past?  Will I ever get to dock at the shores of reconciliation, forgiveness and grace?  Will I ever be known as the person I am today rather than the wretched soul I was before God transformed my life?